Legal Opinion

United States v. Michael Harris

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 30, 1999No. 97-10270PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KLEINFELD, Circuit Judge.

This criminal case raises several questions, including whether the statute criminalizing false statements on ERISA reports 1 is unconstitutionally vague.

FACTS

Harris was president of Harris Realty Company, Inc. His company (he owned a majority interest) had a pension plan for its employees. Pursuant to the plan, the employer was to contribute 12 lh % of each eligible employee’s total compensation per year on their behalf.

Over the fifteen years or so that the plan operated, Harris frequently took money out of the trust fund and loaned it to various entities in which he…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. United States Civil Service Commission v. National Ass'n of Letter CarriersSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. United States v. National Dairy Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. United States v. Richard J. AdamsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. United States v. Kyulle Jay StrongCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. United States v. Javid NaghaniCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. United States v. Marvin L. Wiseman, United States of America v. William D. MettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. State v. TiernanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API