United States v. Kyulle Jay Strong
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CLIFTON, Circuit Judge.
The district court found Defendant-Appellant Kyulle Jay Strong incompetent to stand trial and committed him to the custody of the Attorney General for treatment and restoration pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4241(d). Strong appeals the district court’s commitment order, arguing that § 4241(d) is unconstitutional because it requires mandatory confinement without giv: ing the district court an opportunity to assess a defendant’s individualized circumstances. We conclude that § 4241(d) comports with the Due Process Clause of the Constitution and affirm the commitment order of the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Demore v. KimSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Reno v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- United States v. MagassoubaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- In Re Heritage Bond LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Sonia QuinteroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Shiloh Group, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017
- Sergio Momox-Caselis v. Tara DonohueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.