Legal Opinion

United States v. Kyulle Jay Strong

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 11, 2007No. 06-10566PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLIFTON, Circuit Judge.

The district court found Defendant-Appellant Kyulle Jay Strong incompetent to stand trial and committed him to the custody of the Attorney General for treatment and restoration pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4241(d). Strong appeals the district court’s commitment order, arguing that § 4241(d) is unconstitutional because it requires mandatory confinement without giv: ing the district court an opportunity to assess a defendant’s individualized circumstances. We conclude that § 4241(d) comports with the Due Process Clause of the Constitution and affirm the commitment order of the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Demore v. KimSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Reno v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. United States v. MagassoubaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  2. In Re Heritage Bond LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. Sonia QuinteroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  4. California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Shiloh Group, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017
  5. Sergio Momox-Caselis v. Tara DonohueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API