Legal Opinion

Varnville Furniture Co. v. Charleston & W. C. Ry. Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 15, 1913No. 8648PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Before Memminger, J., Hampton, December, 1912. The facts are stated in the opinion. Action by the Varnville Furniture Company against the Charleston & Western Carolina Railway Company.

Read the full summary

Before Memminger, J., Hampton, December, 1912. The facts are stated in the opinion. Action by the Varnville Furniture Company against the Charleston & Western Carolina Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. submits: The commerce act of Congress as amended by act of June 29, 1906, is exclusive of all State legislation, regulation or policy, as applied to an interstate-shipment, and renders null and void the penalty act of the State of South Carolina, of February, 1903, as amended February 15th, 1910, and cites: 219 U. S. 186; 55 L. Ed. 167, 178, 182; 26 Stats. 717, 719 and…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Hydrick.

Plaintiff recovered judgment against defendant in a magistrate’s Court for $14.75 damages done to a shipment of furniture, while in defendant’s possession in this State, and $4.60, overcharges in the freight collected by defendant thereon, and $50, the penalty allowed by statute (Civ. Code, 1912, section 2573), for the failure of defendant to pay plaintiff’s claim for said damages and overcharge within 40 days after the filing thereof with defendant’s agent. The initial carrier, the Southern Railway Company, received the shipment at…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Savage v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. CarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railway Co. v. QuinceyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  2. White v. Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1946
  3. Schlitten v. HinesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  4. Dupre v. Columbia, N. & L. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1913
  5. Fickling v. Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API