Legal Opinion

Dupre v. Columbia, N. & L. R.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 10, 1913No. 8441; 8650PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Before Gage, J., Columbia, Nall term, 1912. Action by M. B. DuPre against the Columbia, Newberry & Laurens Railroad Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. cite: 91 S. C. 379, 381; 125 U. S. 181; 31 R. Ed. 650; 125 U. S. 465; 162 U. S. 197; 40 R. Ed. 490; 34 S. W. 145.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Hydrick.

This action was brought against the defendant, the terminal carrier of an interstate shipment, to recover the penalty provided by statute (26 Stat. 717, Civil Code 1912, sec. 2572) for failure to pay the damages to a shipment, or trace it, and inform the consignee when, where, and by which carrier it was damaged, within forty days after notice thereof. Defendant admits liability for the penalty if the statute imposing it is not in conflict with the federal statute regulating interstate commerce.

In Meetze v. Sou. Express Co., 81 S.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. HarrimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Riverside MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Southern Railway Co. v. ReidSupreme Court of the United States · 1912

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. ChaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API