Legal Opinion

Hoog v. Dometic Corporation

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided March 22, 2024No. 5:20-cv-00272Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA KEVIN W. HOOG and ) REBECCA HOOG, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. CIV-20-00272-JD ) DOMETIC CORPORATION, ) a Delaware corporation, ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER Before the Court is Defendant Dometic Corporation’s Motion to Exclude Expert Declaration of Allan J. Kam (“Motion”) [Doc. No. 106]. Plaintiffs filed a response in opposition [Doc. No. 113]. For the reasons stated below, the Court grants in part and denies in part the Motion.1 I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs seek money damages following a fire, which they allege was caused by…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. United States v. NacchioCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  3. Specht v. JensenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  4. Goebel v. Denver & Rio Grande Western RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  5. United States v. Rodriguez-FelixCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API