Legal Opinion

Friedman v. 24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California

Decided September 22, 2008No. CV 06-6282 AHM (CTx)PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS (No Proceedings Held)

A. HOWARD MATZ, District Judge.

Stephen Montes, Deputy Clerk.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs filed this putative consumer class action against Defendant 24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc. on October 2, 2006, alleging that Defendant defrauded customers who signed up for gym memberships and withdrew membership fees from customers’ bank and credit card accounts without authorization even after members cancelled their memberships. On July 21, 2008, the Court granted Plaintiffs leave to file a Fourth Amended Complaint and deemed that complaint filed on July 21, 2008.

Be…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Mayle v. FelixSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Robins v. Global Fitness Holdings, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2012
  2. In Re Easysaver Rewards LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2010
  3. Shaw v. Nissan North America, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2016
  4. I.B. ex rel. Fife v. Facebook, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
  5. Peterson v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2014

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API