Legal Opinion

State v. Mossman

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 27, 2012No. 103,111PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Luckert, J.:

James A. Mossman appeals from the imposition of lifetime postrelease supervision following his conviction of aggravated indecent liberties with a child. He contends lifetime post-release supervision constitutes cruel and/or unusual punishment and violates § 9 of the Kansas Constitution Bill of Rights and the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution. We reject Mossman’s arguments, concluding the sentence is not disproportionate to the seriousness of his crime, is not grossly disproportionate to the sentences imposed for other…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Lockyer v. AndradeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Roper v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  2. State v. Petersen-BeardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  3. State v. BreedenSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  4. State v. DullSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  5. State v. Blankenship (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API