Legal Opinion

Hendershott v. City of Grand Rapids

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1905No. Docket No. 61PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to superior court of Grand Rapids; Newnham, J. Case by Henry 0. Hendershott against the city of Grand Rapids for personal injuries. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Moore, 0. J.

The plaintiff recovered a judgment in the sum of $250 for injuries he received upon a defective sidewalk. The case is brought here by writ of error.

There are a great many assignments of error, but we do not deem it necessary to discuss all of them. A short time before plaintiff was injured he rented a house and lot, into which he moved. This house was south of Sweet street, and'about 25 or 30 feet west of North College avenue. It is the claim of plaintiff that he was not familiar with that part of the city, and that when he left his residence, instead of going out the front door…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Thomas v. City of FlintMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Gilson v. City of CadillacMichigan Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kroll v. KatzMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Torma v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Bernardoni v. City of SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Maloney v. City of Grand ForksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Cruz v. City of SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API