Legal Opinion

Cruz v. City of Saginaw

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1963No. Calendar 40, Docket 49,623PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff sued tbe defendant city for injuries sustained November 7, 1959, when be allegedly tripped and fell upon encountering a bole in tbe asphalt pavement of 1 of tbe city streets, opposite 1 of tbe city’s parking lots, at a regular pedestrian crossing. Tbe case was tried to tbe court. At close of plaintiff’s proofs defendant moved for judgment in its favor alleging :

1. Defendant did not have notice, either actual or constructive, of tbe existence of tbe alleged defect.

2. The notice of claim, required prior to suit, did not, although timely given, describe sufficiently the alleged defect.

3…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Torma v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Hulett v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Siegel v. Detroit City Ice & Fuel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Goldsmith v. CodyMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Yarington v. HuckMichigan Supreme Court · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kroll v. KatzMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Banks v. Exxon Mobil Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Bernardoni v. City of SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Anthony Davis v. City of KalamazooMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. Birgetta Walker v. City of RomulusMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API