Legal Opinion

Stanford v. Coram

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1902No. 1,373PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Cascade County; J. B. Leslie, Judge. ActioN by James T. Stanford, as receiver of tlie Northwestern National Dank of Great Falls, Mont., against Joseph A. Coram and another. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant Joseph A. Coram appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Beantly

In the spring of 1894 the Globe National Bank, theretofore-doing business at Kalispell, Mont., went into liquidation. At that time it held certain, promissory notes, which, it seems,, were not then due, viz.: One made by the Libby Townsite & Lumber Company for $9,006.02; one made by Oullette & Tlier-riault, copartners, for $3,742.82; and a third, made by one John Weitman and Kate Weitman, his wife, for $6,522.24. Wishing to obtain in cash the amounts called for by these notes,, the authorities of the bank, through their agent, B. D. Hatcher,, who had charge of the business of the bank,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Innerarity v. Merchants' National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  2. Young v. . HillNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  3. Allen v. South Boston RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  4. Frenkel v. HudsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
  5. Hickman v. GreenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. McCormick v. BrevigMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. D & F SANITATION SERVICE v. City of BillingsMontana Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Comerford v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Noyes v. YoungMontana Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Distillery v. Stromberg-Mullins Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1917

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API