Legal Opinion

Northrup v. City of Toledo Police Division

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided September 30, 2014No. 3:12-cv-01544PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

JEFFREY J. HELMICK, District Judge.

I. Introduction

Before me is the motion of Defendants the City of Toledo Police Division, Officer David Bright, Officer Donald Comes, and Sergeant Daniel Ray, for summary judgment. (Doc. No. 24). Plaintiff Shawn Northrup opposes the Defendants’ motion. (Doc. No. 38). The Defendants have filed a reply. (Doc. No. 44). For the reasons stated below, the Defendants’ motion is granted in part and denied in part.

II. Background

On the evening of June 16, 2010, Northrup was walking down a street in his neighborhood, with his wife, daughter,…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chesney v. City of JacksonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2016
  2. Griesmar v. City of Stow, OhioDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API