Legal Opinion

Griesmar v. City of Stow, Ohio

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided January 24, 2022No. 5:20-cv-01356Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION CANDICE MARIE GRIESMAR, ) Case No. 5:20-cv-01356 ) Plaintiff, ) Judge J. Philip Calabrese ) v. ) ) CITY OF STOW, OHIO, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Candice Marie Griesmar filed suit in State court alleging that Defendants City of Stow, Officer J. Bailey, and Lieutenant H. Prusha violated her rights and those of a putative class under the federal and Ohio Constitutions. (ECF No. 1-2.) Defendants timely removed based on federal question jurisdiction because Plaintiff included a claim under…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API