Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 23, 1927No. 10636Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Appellant renews his contention that Art. 1346, P. C. (1925) supplanted Art. 1410, P. C. (1925) in punishing one for theft of parts and automobile accessories named in Art, 1346, which reads as follows :

“Whoever shall maliciously or wilfully and without authority from the owner unlawfully remove from any motor vehicle or bicycle any portion of the running or steering gear, pump, or any tire, rim, robe, cover, tube, clock, casing, radiator, fire extinguisher, tool, lamp, starter, battery, coil, spring, gas or oil tank, bell or any signal device,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hunt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  2. Espalin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  3. Sparks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915
  4. Acton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API