Sparks v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
HARPER, Judge.
Appellant was prosecuted for theft of an automobile, of value exceeding one thousand dollars, and his punishment assessed at two years confinement in the penitentiary.
The facts clearly justified the jury in finding that appellant was guilty of the theft of the automobile, and the sole question we deem it necessary to discuss (which is raised in several different ways) is theft of an automobile of value in excess of $50 a felony, as is the theft of other personal property, or has the Legislature by section 1 of chapter 100 of the Acts of the Thirty-third Legislature singled out…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Mayor of New York v. Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Lee Bros. Furniture Co. v. CramSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
- People ex rel. Kasson v. RoseIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- State v. MountsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1892
- Davis v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Hunt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Allen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
- International-Great Northern R. v. MallardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Ex Parte JacksonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.