Legal Opinion
General Fish Co. v. Markley
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided July 2, 1952No. A-7765PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIMOND, District Judge.
Several days ago, by reason of the emergency existing, an oral decision was given in this action holding generally for the defendant and against the plaintiff, including a statement of some of the reasons therefor. The subject is of such consequence that the following more detailed view of the facts and the law should be recorded.
The case involves the location and operation of two fish traps situated in tidal ocean waters on the west shore of Trading Bay, Cook Inlet, Alaska. If the operation of one trap is lawful, that of the other is unlawful. While the conflicting…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Belk v. MeagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Forbes v. GraceySupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Manuel v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- McKinley Creek Mining Co. v. Alaska United Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Shea v. NilimaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1904
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Metlakatla Indian Com., Annette Island Res. v. EganAlaska Supreme Court · 1961
- The Tlingit and Haida Indians of Alaska and Harry Douglas, Intervenors v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- Tlingit & Haida Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- Clucas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1991
- Miller v. Snug Harbor Packing Co.District Court, D. Alaska · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.