Legal Opinion

Shea v. Nilima

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 10, 1904No. 1,012PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHawley, District Judge

(after making the foregoing statement). It will be our endeavor to confine the discussion in this case to as few points as possible, and at the same time to cover all material questions that have been properly raised and presented by counsel. It may be said generally that the evidence of Nilima, and the facts set forth in the amended, supplementary, and substituted complaint, make out at least a prima facie case on the part of the appellees; and, unless the legal objections raised thereto by appellants destroy the force and effect thereof, there is enough in the record to sustain the action…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. Portland & Kennebec RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Fairfax's v. Hunter's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
  3. Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. AustinSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. Townsend v. VanderwerkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. Blount v. Societe Anonyme Du Filtre Chamberland Systeme PasteurCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1892

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Dougherty v. California Kettleman Oil Royalties, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Botsford v. Van RiperNevada Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Behre v. Anchor Ins.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
  4. Vogel v. WarsingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1906
  5. Sturm v. UlrichCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API