Metlakatla Indian Com., Annette Island Res. v. Egan
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
NESBETT, Chief Justice.
These controversies arose out of the determination of the State of Alaska to prohibit the use of all fish traps for the taking of salmon for commercial purposes in all the coastal waters of the state. Appellants contended that their fish traps were exceptions to the prohibitions contained in the constitution and laws of Alaska because their operation had been authorized by the Secretary of the Interior of the United States, who, they claimed, had the exclusive right to regulate fishing by Indians in Alaska. The United States District Court for the District (Territory)…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- United States v. KagamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Pollard's Lessee v. HAGANSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
- United States v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Organized Village of Kake v. EganSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Moore v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Metlakatla Indian Community, Annette Islands Reserve v. EganSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- John v. BakerAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. LewisAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.