Martin v. Hudson
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County, and from an order denying a new trial. The transcript was much smaller in size than is required by the rules of the supreme court. The case had been submitted upon its merits without objection raised by counsel to the transcript. The further facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
— Rules five and six of this court provide specifically how transcripts on appeal to this court shall be arranged and printed, and in rule six it is said: “The chronological arrangement of the several parts of the transcript, and a strict compliance with the other requirements of this rule, will be exacted of the appellant' or party filing the record here in all cases by the court, whether objection by the opposite party be made or not; and for any failure or neglect in these respects, which is found to obstruct the examination of the record, the appeal may be dismissed.”
It has…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Leslie v. RoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Dees v. CasselsSupreme Court of Florida · 1907
- Porter v. EwingSupreme Court of Florida · 1906