Legal Opinion · Dissent

Porter v. Ewing

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 15, 1906Published

This case was decided by tbe Court En Banc. Writ of Error to tbe Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County. The facts ,in the case are stated in the opinion of the Court. Park hill, J., dissents.

1DissentParki-iill, J.

This case was dismissed because of the defective certificate of the clerk to the .transcript of record, in accordance with precedents established by this court long before I came here.

Although I have been inclined heretofore to recognize the force of these precedents, this practice of dismissing writs of error in this way has never been satisfactory to me, and I have hoped that the court could see its way clear to adopt a different practice. This was my attitude when the application for reinstatement was denied in case of Akin et al. v. Margan et al. at June Term, A. D. 1905, and further…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Idaho & Oregon Land Improvement Co. v. BradburySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Ray v. TriceSupreme Court of Florida · 1904
  3. Martin v. HudsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API