Dees v. Cassels
Supreme Court of Florida
This case was decided.by Division A. Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Taylor County. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Dissent
Parkhill, J.,
(dissenting-). — Instead of dismissing the writ of error absolutely because of the defect in the clerk’s certificate to the transcript, I think an order should be made that the submission of this case be set aside, and that the plaintiff in error be permitted to append to the transcript a certificate .in the form prescribed by the miles, serving a copy thereof upon defendant in error within ten days, and that upon failure to comply with the order the writ of error be dismissed. Martin v. Hudson, 79 Cal. 612, 21 Pac. Rep. 1135; Idaho & Oregon Land Imp. Co. v. Bradbury, 132 U. S.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Idaho & Oregon Land Improvement Co. v. BradburySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Porter v. EwingSupreme Court of Florida · 1906
- Martin v. HudsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889