Legal Opinion

Hipsher v. L. A. Cnty. Emps. Ret. Ass'n

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided June 19, 2018No. B276486PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEpstein, P.J.

*568*747The Public Employees' Pension Reform Act of 2013 ( Gov. Code, § 7522 et seq. [PEPRA] )1 was enacted, in part, to curb *748abuses in public pensions systems throughout the state. ( Alameda County Deputy Sheriff's Assn . v. Alameda County Employees' Retirement Assn . (2018) 19 Cal.App.5th 61, 75, 227 Cal.Rptr.3d 787 ( Alameda ), review granted Mar. 28, 2018, S247095.) Section 7522.72 provides a mechanism whereby a public pensioner forfeits a portion of his or her retirement benefits following a conviction of a felony offense that occurred in the performance of his or her official duties.2

Shortly…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Alameda County Deputy etc. v. Alameda County Employees' etc.California Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Hipsher v. Los Angeles County Employees Retirement etc.California Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API