Legal Opinion

United States v. Barragan

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided December 11, 2008No. 1:07-cr-00066PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SUPPRESS

SARAH EVANS BARKER, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the Motion to Suppress [Docket No. 287] filed by Defendant, Jose Mendoza Barragan, on August 12, 2008. In his motion, Barragan seeks to suppress evidence that the government obtained through wiretap surveillance, on the ground that it was obtained in violation of his Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. For the reasons detailed below, Defendant’s Motion is DENIED.

Analysis

I. Factual Background

The current motion to suppress challenges the order that…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. CeballosCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  2. United States v. Antonio Cruz Vazquez, Benito Luis Cortina, Antonio Gonzalez, Andres Rene Rappard, and Jose De La Fe-QuintasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  3. United States v. Delores Homick, United States of America v. Charles DietzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. United States v. RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. KalustianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Maley v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2020
  2. State v. TorresHawaii Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State v. TorresHawaii Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. TorresHawaii Supreme Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API