Legal Opinion
United States v. Kalustian
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 4, 1975No. Nos. 74-3314, 74-3315, 74-3305, 74-3264 and 74-3265PublishedCited by 77 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before ELY and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and SKOPIL,* District Judge. SKOPIL, District Judge:
Appellants seek review of their convictions for illegal gambling activities. 18 U.S.C. §§ 1955 and 2. They claim their motions for suppression of evidence were improperly denied. They also argue that there was insufficient evidence to sustain the verdicts.
According to the Government, confidential informants “advised” federal agents in 1971 that defendant Kalustian was operating a bookmaking operation from the Topper Club (Club) in Rose-mead, California. Defendants Pond and Marino, among…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Berger v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. GiordanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- Batzel v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Benjamin Ruggiero, Nicholas Santora, Anthony Rabito, and Antonio TomasuloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- United States v. TorresCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Vito Spillone, United States of America v. John Clyde Abel, United States of America v. Frank CitroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. TorresCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.