Legal Opinion

Charles Coleman, Cross-Appellee v. State of Alabama, Cross-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided September 21, 1987No. 86-7151PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Senior Circuit Judge:

Coleman filed this petition for federal habeas corpus to set aside his guilty pleas to assault with intent to murder in 1972 and larceny from a person in 1977, because he was not informed of the possible availability of the Alabama Youthful Offender Act. 1 Coleman argues that his pleas of guilty were not made with full knowledge of their consequences and thus were made in violation of his federal due process rights. Although Coleman has satisfied both the 1972 and 1977 probationary sentences, he maintains this challenge to their constitutionality arguing that if…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  3. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Suzanne Germany v. Carol Vance, Suzanne Germany v. Carol VanceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  2. United States v. Jose Javier Fernandez and Jorge Cole, Appeal of Jose Javier FernandezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  3. Ex Parte RiversSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  4. Sammie Lee Gordon v. John E. Nagle, Warden Attorney General of the State of AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
  5. Gordon v. NagleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API