In Re D.S.

{¶ 25} Respectfully, I concur in the majority’s judgment but not fully in its reasoning. I agree with the majority that it is unnecessary in resolving this case to address whether R.C. 2152.18(B) is unconstitutional as applied to appellant, D.S. I disagree, however, with the majority’s decision to resolve the issue of statutory interpretation that D.S. raises — whether R.C. 2152.18(B) requires a juvenile court to credit all days a juvenile has been held in confinement pending *399disposition of a delinquency charge. The juvenile court could not have reasonably determined in light of the totality…