Legal Opinion

Stuhr v. City of Grand Island

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1933No. 28131PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoss, C. J.

This ease, involving a judgment for damages .arising out of condemnation of plaintiff’s land for a sewer, was heard by one of the divisions of the court, and an opinion was adopted reversing the judgment of the district court. Stuhr v. City of Grand Island, 123 Neb. 369. A motion for rehearing was duly filed. On consideration thereof-an oral argument on the motion was allowed and had by the full court. The case was fully reargued — as if on the merits.

An injunction suit between the same parties, arising over the sewer, was previously before this court. Stuhr v. City of Grand Island, 120 Neb.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fremont, Elkhorn & Missouri Valley Railroad v. BatesNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Stuhr v. City of Grand IslandNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Murray v. BurdNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Northeastern Nebraska Railroad v. FrazierNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Van Horn v. Cooper & Cole Bros.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Platte Valley Public Power & Irrigation District v. ArmstrongNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Lilienthal v. Platte Valley Public Power & Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Pritchard v. PurcellHigh Court of American Samoa · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API