Murray v. Burd
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from tlie district court for Harlan county. Tried below before Adams, J.
1Opinion of the Court
Pound, C.
As the bill of exceptions has been quashed, we have only to .consider two assignments of error, relating to the instructions of the court. The trial court did not state the issues, but merely told the jury that the defendant, who admitted execution and delivery of the note sued on, must prove the “material allegations” of the answer, in which he set up an affirmative defense, by a “fair preponder*428anee of the evidence.” There was no statement as to what allegations were material, nor as to what issues were raised upon the answer. Undoubtedly it is the duty of the trial court to state…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fitzgerald v. McCartySupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
- Bryan v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1884
- Wilbur v. StoepelMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Dorr v. SimersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
- Lindsay v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Horst v. LewisNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
- Washington v. DrakeNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
- Merritt v. Ash Grove Lime & Portland Cement Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1939
- Havlik v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1910
- Van Horn v. Cooper & Cole Bros.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1911
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.