Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Grady

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 2003No. 03-2159-DPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

¶ 1. We review the stipulation filed by Attorney Michael H. Grady and the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) pursuant to SCR 22.12, 1 which sets forth findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding Attorney Grady's professional misconduct. The parties stipulated to a 90-day suspension of Attorney Grady's license to practice law. We accept the parties' stipulation and agree that a suspension of 90 days is appropriate discipline for Attorney Grady's misconduct.

¶ 2. Attorney Grady was admitted to practice in 1984. He has no previous disciplinary history.

¶ 3. According to the OLR complaint…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against WinterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Joseph M. CapistrantWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. FarrisWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API