In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Grady
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Per curiam
¶ 1. We review the stipulation filed by Attorney Michael H. Grady and the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) pursuant to SCR 22.12, 1 which sets forth findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding Attorney Grady's professional misconduct. The parties stipulated to a 90-day suspension of Attorney Grady's license to practice law. We accept the parties' stipulation and agree that a suspension of 90 days is appropriate discipline for Attorney Grady's misconduct.
¶ 2. Attorney Grady was admitted to practice in 1984. He has no previous disciplinary history.
¶ 3. According to the OLR complaint…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against WinterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
3Cited by2 opinions
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Joseph M. CapistrantWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. FarrisWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004