Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Rose

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 2007No. 2007-0322PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Janet Toby Rose of Cincinnati, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0015081, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1978. The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline recommends that we now suspend respondent’s license to practice for six months based on findings that (1) she failed to disclose to a client that she lacked professional liability insurance and (2) she appeared on a client’s behalf while registered as inactive. See Gov.Bar R. VI(2). On review, we agree that respondent violated the Code of Professional Responsibility and hold that a six-month…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. GlatkiOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. GlatkiOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1999

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. SabolOhio Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API