Legal Opinion

State v. Miller

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 14, 1973No. 44PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUSKINS, Justice.

Defendant contended in the trial court and in the Court of Appeals, and contends here, that the search warrant was invalid and the entry by the officers unlawful. The Court of Appeals so held and we concur.

The Fourth Amendment to the Federal Constitution prohibits the issuance of a search warrant except upon a finding of probable cause for the search. G.S. 15-25 (a) is to like effect. There is no variance between Fourth Amendment requirements and the law of this State in regard to search warrants. State v. Vestal, 278 N.C. 561, 180 S.E. 2d 755 (1971).

G.S. 15-26 requires a…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  5. Nathanson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. State v. ArringtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. State v. DoeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
  3. In Re: Joseph Lee MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. United States v. Steven Curtis WaupekenayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  5. State v. GuevaraSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API