Legal Opinion

United States v. Steven Curtis Waupekenay

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 31, 1992No. 91-2239PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EBEL, Circuit Judge.

In this case, we review the district court’s decision to grant the defendant-ap-pellee’s motion to suppress evidence obtained after the defendant-appellee assaulted police officers who had entered his house trailer to intervene in a domestic dispute. We must address two issues. First, did the defendant-appellee’s wife give the officers consent to enter the trailer? Second, if the officers did not receive consent, should the evidence of the defendant-appellee’s assault upon the officers inside the trailer be suppressed as the fruit of an illegal police entry?

We hold that…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. United States v. Carl Sprinkle, A/K/A Carl SprinklerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
  2. United States v. Bonnie Kaye LittleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. Eugene L. DawdyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  4. United States v. Teresa Mechell GriffinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  5. Saldana v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API