Legal Opinion
Somsak v. Criton Technologies/Heath Tecna, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided August 19, 2002No. 48948-8-IPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAppelwick, J.
— A jury found that Mary J. Somsak’s industrial insurance benefits did not include compensation she was entitled to for overtime hours and health care benefits. A superior court judge remanded the case for valuation of her health care benefits and recalculation of her compensation. Criton appeals.
It was during Somsak’s appeal that the Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court interpreted the Industrial Insur*89anee Act, Title 51 RCW, to include health care benefits paid by an employer in the time-loss compensation calculation. Cockle v. Dep’t of Labor & Indus., 96 Wn. App. 69, 86, 977 P.2d 668…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Cockle v. Dept. of Labor and IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Bowers v. Transamerica Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Cockle v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Berryman v. MetcalfCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Lynn v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- Lynn v. STATE DEPT. OF LABOR & INDUSTRIESCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- Deborah Ewing v. Green Tree Services LlcCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
- Somsak v. CRITON TECHNOLOGIESCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.