Legal Opinion
Blume v. Meneley
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided July 16, 2003No. CIV.A.00-2559-CMPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MURGUIA, District Judge.
Pending before the court is defendant Shawnee County’s Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. 141), in which defendant asks the court to reconsider that portion of its June 25, 2003 Memorandum and Order (Doc. 139) that denied defendant Shawnee County’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 91). In support of its Motion for Reconsideration, defendant Shawnee County directs the court to examine a recent Kansas Supreme Court case that may serve to negate any vicarious liability defendant Shawnee County would otherwise have in this case. For the reasons set forth…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- State Ex Rel. Stovall v. MeneleySupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
- Board of Lincoln County Comm'rs v. NielanderSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
- Clark v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
3Cited by15 opinions
- Estate of Hammers v. Douglas Cnty.District Court, D. Kansas · 2018
- Hughes v. KeathDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2004
- Ailin v. Leavenworth County Sheriff's OfficeDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2019
- Attorney General Opinion No., Kansas Attorney General Reports2006
- Ayesh v. Butler County Sheriff's OfficeDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2019
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.