Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Keath

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided August 4, 2004No. 03-4170-JARPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

ROBINSON, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on defendants James Keath, Melissa D. Thiesing, the Board of County Commissioners of the County of Neosho, Kansas, R.E. Clements, Vernon Shultz, and Donnie Yarnell (“defendants”) Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 13). Defendants move to dismiss plaintiff David Hughes’ claims of wrongful termination and violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for failure to state a claim pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). For the reasons stated below, defendants’ motion is granted in…

2Cases cited24 opinions

Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
Hall v. BellmonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Bolden v. City of TopekaDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2008