Legal Opinion
Clark v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 11, 2003No. 01-1341PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Circuit Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff-Appellant Ricky Eugene,Clark filed a class action suit in Colorado District Court, County of Pueblo, against Defendant-Appellee State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. (“State Farm”) for extended personal injury protection (“PIP”) benefits under the Colorado Auto Accident Reparations Act (“CAARA”). See Colo.Rev.Stat. §§ 10-4-701 to -726 (2000). 1 Clark sought reformation of an insurance policy issued by State Farm. In addition, Clark brought claims for breach of contract for failure to pay extended PIP benefits, breach of the duty of good…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Sutton v. Utah State School for the Deaf & BlindCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Martin Marietta Corp. v. LorenzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Lujan v. Colorado State Board of EducationSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Teigen v. RenfrowCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Hill v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Donchez v. Coors Brewing Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Eateries, Inc. v. J. R. Simplot Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. BoellstorffCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.