Alliance Mutual Insurance v. Dove
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
STEELMAN, Judge.
The exclusion clause in the commercial liability insurance policy must be narrowly construed to limit its application to the “specific part of any property that must be restored, repaired, or replaced because of faults in your work.” We affirm the summary judgment ruling of the trial court.
I. Factual and Procedural Background
Murphy-Brown owns and operates a feed mill in Laurinburg. Murphy-Brown contracted with Glen Dove d/b/a Dove’s Welding & Fabrication (“defendant”) to repair a broken elevator belt in a grain elevator. Grain was delivered by rail to the feed mill where it…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Howerton v. Arai Helmet, Ltd.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
- Columbia Mutual Insurance Co. v. SchaufSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
- ACUITY v. Burd & Smith Construction, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Hobson Construction Co. v. Great American InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- City of Greenville v. HaywoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cincinnati Insurance Company, The v. Charlotte Paint Company IncDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2020
- City Of Fayetteville v. Security National Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2019
- DENC, LLC v. PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2019
- The Durham Wood Fired Pizza Company LLC doing business as DASHI, et al. v. The Cincinnati Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2026