Legal Opinion

United States v. Lazenby

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided June 3, 1925PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ATWELL, District Judge.

The bill alleges that the Dr. Pepper Company, a corporation, was dissolved on December 15, 1920, at which time the defendant, R. S. Lazenby, was the sole and only stockholder; that prior to the dissolution and dissipation of the Pepper corporation assets, it, the corporation, had on May 7, 1919, filed a corporation income profits tax return for the calendar year 1918, “purporting to be a true and correct statement of the gains, profits, and income from all sources received by or accrued to said company during the calendar year ending December 31, 1918”; that it showed a…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Walker v. SauvinetSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Cheatham v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Bauserman v. BluntSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Braun v. SauerweinSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  5. Amy v. WatertownSupreme Court of the United States · 1889

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Romano v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
  2. Wagner v. New York, Ontario and Western RailwayDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API