Legal Opinion

Sutton v. Benjamin

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1925No. Docket No. 40PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.

Defendants Frank and Edith Hughes were residents of Flint, and were the owners of a grist mill situate at South Whitley, Indiana. They placed it for sale in the hands of defendants Benjamin, who were real estate brokers. The Benjamins sold the mill to plaintiffs, taking residence property in Flint in payment therefor. Plaintiffs moved to South Whitley, and took charge of the mill, and have since operated it. After taking possession of the mill Sutton claims he learned that the Benjamins had misrepresented the value, extent and condition of the mill property, and he brought this action at law…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kefuss v. WhitleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Pinch v. HotalingMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Bartholomew v. WalshMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  4. People v. JacobsMichigan Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kamalnath v. Mercy Memorial Hospital Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Anderson v. ConterioMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Field v. SteinerMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Boss v. TomarasMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Grewe v. Mount Clemens General HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API