Legal Opinion

Hill-Murray Federation of Teachers, St. Paul v. Hill-Murray High School, Maplewood

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 29, 1991No. C3-90-2617PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHORT, Judge.

Hill-Murray High School appeals from a decision of the Bureau of Mediation Services (BMS) certifying a teachers’ union as the exclusive bargaining unit at the church-operated school. Hill-Murray challenges the application of the Minnesota Labor Relations Act, Minn.Stat. §§ 179.01-17 (1990), to its operations under the religion clauses of the state and federal constitutions. In the alternative, Hill-Murray challenges the exclusion of certain teachers from the proposed bargaining unit. We reverse the BMS’ decision on constitutional grounds, and therefore do not address the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Investigation & Determination of an Appropriate Unit & Exclusive Representative Hill-Murray Federation of Teachers, St. Paul v. Hill-Murray High School, MaplewoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  2. Black v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  3. Black v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  4. Investigation & Determination of an Appropriate Unit & Exclusive Representative Hill-Murray Federation of Teachers, St. Paul v. Hill-Murray High School, MaplewoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API