Hewitt v. Sanborn
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtKeeler, J.
The defendants’ counsel specify ninety-six reasons of appeal from the judgment of the court, of which fifty-four relate to errors of law apparent in the finding, and forty-two are concerned with errors relating to the correction of the finding. Corrections in accordance with the errors assigned would result in a finding almost diametrically opposed upon certain issues, and render the holdings of the court utterly at variance with those called for by the finding if corrected. The requested additions to the finding not made by the trial judge are either based on conflicting evidence or are…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Smith v. AyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Ricard v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1822
- Braman v. BabcockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Burwell v. CawoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
- Foote v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Shannon v. EnoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Reiley v. HealeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- Finnegan v. LafontaineSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Hewitt v. BeattieSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- State Bar Ass'n v. Connecticut Bank & Trust Co.Connecticut Superior Court · 1957
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.