Legal Opinion
Braman v. Babcock
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 1, 1923PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
The complaint alleges that Peleg S. Barber of Stonington, Connecticut, died in 1901, leaving a will which was duly admitted to probate in the Court of Probate for the district of Stonington. Mattie P. Babcock was named therein as executrix and trustee, and duly qualified as such in 1901.
Section 23 of this will is as follows: “I give and bequeath to my granddaughter Mattie P. Babcock the income or rent of the buildings now standing on High Street in the Town of Westerly, Nos. 38, 40, 42, 44, 46 and known as the Barber Memorial Building during her natural life; she is to keep the buildings in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Muskrat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- De Vaughn v. HutchinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Clarke v. ClarkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Anway v. Grand Rapids Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1920
- Norwalk Street Railway Company's AppealSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- James v. Alderton Dock Yards, Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Kariher's Petition (No. 1)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- American Automobile Ins. Co. v. FreundtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
- Washington-Detroit Theatre Co. v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Zoercher v. AglerIndiana Supreme Court · 1930
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.