State Bar Ass'n v. Connecticut Bank & Trust Co.
Connecticut Superior Court
1Opinion of the CourtPhillips, J.
In these two suits the plaintiffs seek to restrain the defendants, hereinafter referred to as the banks, from engaging in certain acts and practices which they claim constitute the illegal practice of law. The plaintiffs also seek a declaratory judgment as to whether or not these acts and practices constitute the unlawful practice of law and violations of §§ 7638 and 7641 of the General Statutes. The two suits will be treated together in this memorandum.
It should be borne in mind throughout this discussion that the choice of a criterion as to what constitutes the practice of law must be made…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Clark v. AustinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
- In Re DuncanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1909
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. JonesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
- Arkansas Bar Association v. Union National BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- West Virginia State Bar v. EarleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1959
- Gardner v. North Carolina State BarSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Isaac v. Mount Sinai HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
- Triton Associates v. Six New Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Bar Ass'n of Tennessee, Inc. v. Union Planters Title Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1959
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.