Legal Opinion

Dangerfield v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 14, 2008No. 26412PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Toal

In this case, the post-conviction relief (PCR) court granted partial relief to Katherine Dangerfield (“Respondent”) finding that a magistrates court’s imposition of a suspended sentence without a hearing did not afford Respondent due process of law. This Court granted certiorari to review the PCR court’s grant of relief, and we affirm.

Factual/Procedural Background

In July 2001, Respondent pled guilty to passing 110 fraudulent checks. Pursuant to a plea agreement between Respondent and the State, a magistrate sentenced Respondent to thirty days imprisonment to be served consecutively (a total…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Suber v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  4. Talley v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  5. State v. HillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. South Carolina Coastal Conservation League v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  2. State v. DukesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013
  3. State v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  4. State v. PerkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  5. Bixby v. StirlingDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API