Dangerfield v. State
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Toal
In this case, the post-conviction relief (PCR) court granted partial relief to Katherine Dangerfield (“Respondent”) finding that a magistrates court’s imposition of a suspended sentence without a hearing did not afford Respondent due process of law. This Court granted certiorari to review the PCR court’s grant of relief, and we affirm.
Factual/Procedural Background
In July 2001, Respondent pled guilty to passing 110 fraudulent checks. Pursuant to a plea agreement between Respondent and the State, a magistrate sentenced Respondent to thirty days imprisonment to be served consecutively (a total…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Suber v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
- Talley v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
- State v. HillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- South Carolina Coastal Conservation League v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
- State v. DukesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013
- State v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
- State v. PerkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
- Bixby v. StirlingDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.