State v. Hill
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Chief Justice TOAL:
The trial court revoked Respondent’s probation after he committed several probation violations. The court of appeals reversed in part, holding that Rule 5, SCRCrimP (titled “Disclosure in Criminal Cases”) and the disclosure rule announced in Brady v. Maryland1 applied to probation revocation proceedings. The State appealed and we now reverse.
Factual/Procedural Background
Respondent received a twenty year prison sentence for convictions of second degree arson, second degree burglary, malicious injury to personal property, driving under the influence — fourth offense, and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hyman v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
- State v. MosesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010
- Dangerfield v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
- State v. PaulingCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
- State v. HemmesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.