Legal Opinion

Endicott v. Van Petten

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided August 12, 1971No. W-4432PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

THEIS, District Judge.

The captioned ease is presently before the Court on defendants’ motion to dismiss for the reason that plaintiff’s complaint fails to state a claim for which relief can be granted. Pursuant to Rule 12(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C., the Court will treat the motion as one for summary judgment and dispose of the same as provided in Rule 56, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.

The plaintiff, Gilbert Endicott, at all times material to this action, held a valid certificate to teach in the public…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Wood v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, LARAMIE CTY SCH. D. NO. 1 v. SpiegelWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Powell v. BOARD OF TRUST., CROOK CTY. SCH. DIST. NO. 1Wyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Hayes v. Cape Henlopen School DistrictDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1972
  5. Wertz v. Southern Cloud Unified School District 334Supreme Court of Kansas · 1975

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API