Legal Opinion

Powell v. BOARD OF TRUST., CROOK CTY. SCH. DIST. NO. 1

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1976No. 4524PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1113ROSE, Justice.

INTRODUCTION

It is axiomatic that the courts should not undertake to administer the school systems of Wyoming. We should not substitute our judgment in educational matters for those of school boards and administrators. We said as much in Shenefield v. Sheridan County School District No. 1, Wyo., 544 P.2d 870, 874:

“. . . This court has consistently recognized the importance of administrative boards and their decisions. It has adhered to the rule that our courts will not substitute their judgment for that of the particular hoard or commission . . . ” (Citing cases) 1

We reaffirm and…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Pan American Petroleum Corp. v. Wyoming Oil & Gas Conservation CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1968
  2. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, LARAMIE CTY SCH. D. NO. 1 v. SpiegelWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Colorado-Wyoming Gas Co. v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Wind River Indian Education Ass'n v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Geraud v. SchraderWyoming Supreme Court · 1975

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Worker's Compensation Claim of Newman v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Briggs v. BOARD OF DIRECTORS, ETC.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  3. City of Casper v. UtechWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  4. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ETC. v. HolsoWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  5. BD. OF ED. OF FORT MADISON COMMUNITY v. YouelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API