Legal Opinion
Maislin Industries and U.S. Inc. v. Primary Steel, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided July 17, 1989No. 88-2267PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge.
This case presents the issue of whether the “filed rate doctrine,” which requires a motor carrier to collect the rate published in a filed tariff, obliges Primary Steel, Inc. to pay Maislin Industries and U.S., Inc. an amount greater than that which the parties negotiated. The district court affirmed a ruling of the Interstate Commerce Commission finding it unreasonable under 49 U.S.C. § 10701 for Maislin to recover tariff charges higher than those agreed to by the parties. Maislin Indus. v. Primary Steel, 705 F.Supp. 1401 (W.D.Mo.1988). On appeal, Maislin…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Nader v. Allegheny Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Maislin Industries, U. S., Inc. v. Primary Steel, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Atlantis Express, Inc. v. Standard Transportation Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Thomas G. Lovett, Jr., Trustee for the Bankruptcy Estate of Transportation Systems International, Inc. v. Honeywell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Delta Traffic Service, Inc. v. Transtop, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Advance United Expressways, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.