Legal Opinion

Advance United Expressways, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Company

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 26, 1992No. 91-1320PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge:

In this interstate tariff undercharge case, we examine the roles played by the Interstate Commerce Commission and the district courts when the reasonableness of a tariff rate or practice is at issue. For the reasons set forth below, we hold that, in the light of Maislin Industries, U.S., Inc. v. Primary Steel, Inc., 497 U.S. 116, 110 S.Ct. 2759, 111 L.Ed.2d 94 (1990), shippers may assert rate unreasonableness as a defense in an action by a carrier for undercharges and that district courts should refer issues pertaining to rate unreasonableness in such cases to…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Great Northern Railway Co. v. Merchants Elevator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Maislin Industries, U. S., Inc. v. Primary Steel, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1915

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Katie Arsberry v. State of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  2. North Penn Transfer, Inc. v. Victaulic Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Baltimore and Ohio Chicago Terminal Railroad Company v. Wisconsin Central LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  4. Jones Truck Lines, Inc. v. Aladdin Synergetics, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1994
  5. F.P. Corp. v. Ken Way Transportation, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API