City of Dayton v. Dabney
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Frederick N. Young, Judge.
The city of Dayton (“the city”), appellant, is appealing from the granting of a motion to suppress filed by Curtis D. Dabney, appellee, pursuant to Crim.R. 12(J), which allows for an appeal by the prosecution upon certification that it is not taken for purpose of delay and that the granting of the motion to suppress the evidence in the case has rendered the prosecution’s proof with respect to the pending charge so weak in its entirety that any reasonable possibility of effective prosecution has been destroyed.
The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City of Xenia v. WallaceOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Zangerle v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1942
- City of Aurora v. KepleyOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. HensleyOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
- State v. LautzenheiserOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. VariOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. ByrnesOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. MaylOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. O'NeillOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. Truax, 06 Be 66 (9-17-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.