American Insurance v. Bailey & Musgrove
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Action on insurance policy, from city court of Miller county— TV. I. Geer, judge pro hac vice. March 11, 1909.
1Opinion of the CourtPowell, J.
1. It is not proper to assign error upon the overruling of a demurrer to a petition, as a ground of a motion for a new trial.
2. Where one of the parties to an action is notified by his opponent to produce documents to be used in evidence, and’ the notice requires the production at a designated term, but at that term the case is continued* a response to the notice may be required at the subsequent term.
3. Motions to continue on the ground of surprise, on account of amendments filed, are addressed to the sound discretion of the court. There was no abuse of discretion in the present ease. Ga.,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Traders Insurance v. MannSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Harp v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- Missouri State Life Insurance v. LovelaceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co. v. SasserCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
3Cited by14 opinions
- Sentinel Fire Insurance v. McRobertsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Life Ins. Co. of Georgia v. BurkeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
- Lincoln Life Insurance v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Georgia Life Insurance v. McCranieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
- Miller v. EverettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.